Peerdom vs Holaspirit: Comparing Governance and Self-Management Platforms

If your organization is exploring governance platforms, whether you practice holacracy, sociocracy, agile, or any form of role-based governance, you have probably encountered both Peerdom and Holaspirit during your search. Holaspirit was built to serve self-managed organizations following holacracy. Peerdom was built to serve any organizational model that values clarity, transparency, and adaptable structure. Both take roles, circles, and transparency seriously. But they differ in philosophy, architecture, and where they are headed.

This comparison is written to help you make an informed decision. We will be straightforward about where each platform excels and where it falls short. Peerdom is our product, and we are naturally biased, but a useful comparison requires honesty, so that is what you will get.

The Holaspirit-to-Talkspirit Transition

Before diving into features, it is worth noting a significant change in Holaspirit’s trajectory. Holaspirit has been absorbed into Talkspirit, a broader European collaboration platform. If you visit holaspirit.com today, you will be redirected to talkspirit.com. The product is now positioned as part of “the European platform that aligns structure, collaboration and communication.”

What does this mean in practice? Holaspirit’s governance features still exist, but they are now part of a larger suite that includes internal communication tools (chat, newsfeed), a document drive, and collaboration features. For organizations that wanted a dedicated governance platform, this shift changes the value proposition: you are now buying into a broader collaboration ecosystem rather than a focused self-management tool.

This is not inherently negative. Some organizations prefer an all-in-one suite. Others prefer a modular approach where each tool does one thing well and integrates with the rest of their stack. That preference will shape which platform fits you better.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Feature	Holaspirit (now Talkspirit)	Peerdom
Product status	Absorbed into Talkspirit collaboration suite	Independent, actively developed
Governance model support	Holacracy-focused (with sociocracy support)	Framework-agnostic: traditional hierarchies, agile, sociocracy, holacracy, hybrid
Org visualization	Org chart within platform	Dynamic maps with circle, tree, and list views
Role management	Roles within circles	Roles with purpose, accountabilities, domains, plus custom fields
Meeting management	Built-in tactical and governance meetings	Not built-in; integrates with dedicated meeting tools
Goal tracking	OKRs	Goals app: OKR, KPI, SMART, and custom frameworks
Project management	Kanban board	Projects app linked to roles and groups
Communication	Built-in chat and newsfeed	Integrates with Microsoft Teams and Slack
Elections and governance	Consent-based elections	Elections app with multiple election methods
Change history	Limited	Journal with full audit trail and red/green diff
Apps ecosystem	Bundled suite	Modular: 11 separate apps you can enable or disable
API and integrations	Slack, Jira, Trello, Asana, Todoist	GraphQL API, webhooks, Zapier, Pipedream, n8n, Microsoft Teams
SSO	Yes	Microsoft Entra, Google Workspace, Okta
Languages	10 languages	English, German, French
Data hosting	EU-based	Swiss-hosted, GDPR compliant
Pricing	Freemium; Rise at 79 EUR/month; Scale at 149 EUR/month	Free up to 10 users; then CHF 5/user/month
AI readiness	No	API-accessible for AI agent governance

A few things stand out immediately. Holaspirit/Talkspirit bundles more features into the core product, especially around communication and meetings. Peerdom takes a modular approach where you enable only the apps you need and connect them to the tools your organization already uses. Neither approach is universally better; it depends on how your organization works and what tools you already have in place.

Where Holaspirit (Talkspirit) Excels

Built-in meeting facilitation

This is Holaspirit’s strongest differentiator. If your organization runs governance meetings and tactical meetings following holacratic or sociocratic processes, Holaspirit provides structured meeting facilitation directly in the platform. You can run triage, process agenda items, and capture outputs without leaving the tool. For organizations that want their governance process and their governance software in the same interface, this is genuinely valuable.

All-in-one communication

With the Talkspirit integration, Holaspirit now includes chat, a newsfeed, and a document drive. If your organization does not already use Slack, Microsoft Teams, or a similar communication platform, having everything in one place reduces tool sprawl. This is particularly appealing for smaller organizations that want to minimize the number of platforms they manage.

Language coverage

With support for 10 languages, Holaspirit/Talkspirit has broader language coverage than Peerdom’s current three languages (English, German, French). For multilingual organizations operating across many regions, this is a practical consideration.

Established holacracy workflow

Holaspirit was originally built as a holacracy-specific tool, and that heritage shows. If your organization follows holacracy strictly and wants software that maps directly to the holacracy constitution, Holaspirit’s workflow is well-aligned with that methodology. For more context on what holacracy tooling looks like in practice, see our holacracy tools and practices guide.

Where Peerdom Excels

Governance flexibility

Peerdom was designed to be framework-agnostic from the beginning. It supports traditional hierarchies, agile teams, matrix structures, sociocracy, holacracy, Teal organizations, the Peach model, network organizations, and hybrid models, all within the same organizational map. This matters because most organizations in practice are hybrids: one department uses agile practices, another follows sociocratic governance, a third applies Buurtzorg-style self-managed teams, and a fourth maintains a conventional reporting structure. Peerdom does not force you to pick one model and apply it uniformly.

This flexibility also means Peerdom serves organizations at every stage of their governance evolution. You can start with a traditional org chart, introduce role-based governance in one team, and expand from there. The tool grows with your organizational needs rather than requiring you to adopt a specific framework on day one. For a practical walkthrough of this transition, see how to implement role-based governance.

“Smart, simple, flexible and transparent. A game-changer for truly agile organizations.” — Germain Augsburger, BKW

Visual mapping as a first-class feature

Peerdom describes itself as the “Google Maps of the workplace,” and the metaphor is apt. The organizational map is not an afterthought generated from a database; it is the primary interface. You can navigate your organization through circle views (nested governance structures), tree views (hierarchical perspective), and list views (flat, searchable). Roles, teams, goals, and projects are all visible on the map, color-coded and interactive.

This visual-first approach has a direct impact on onboarding and day-to-day navigation. When a new employee can open the map and immediately understand who does what, where they fit, and who to ask about a specific domain, that is organizational clarity that pays for itself quickly.

“New employees say they are immediately oriented, in contrast to what took them years in their previous organisations!” — Christophe Barman, Loyco

Modular apps ecosystem

Peerdom offers 11 separate apps that you can enable or disable based on your needs: Goals, Projects, Directory, Journal, Elections, Feedback, Drafts, Network, Insights, Pages, and Contribution. This modularity means you are not paying for, or navigating, features you do not use. You can start with the core map and roles, then add Goals when you are ready for OKR tracking, add Elections when you want formal governance processes, and add Journal when you need a full audit trail.

This is a fundamentally different approach from a bundled suite. It respects the principle that different organizations need different tools, and that needs change over time. You can explore the full set of available modules on the apps page.

Comprehensive change history

Peerdom’s Journal provides a full audit trail of every organizational change, with red/green diffs that show exactly what changed, when, and by whom. This is essential for governance accountability. When someone asks “when did this role’s accountabilities change?” or “who proposed this restructure?”, the Journal has the answer. Holaspirit’s change history, by comparison, is more limited in its tracking granularity.

AI-readiness

Peerdom’s GraphQL API and role model are designed to be accessible to AI agents. Organizations can assign AI agents as role holders (displayed with hexagonal shapes to distinguish them from human role holders), enabling genuine human-AI collaboration within the governance structure. This is not a theoretical roadmap item; it is a working capability today. As organizations increasingly integrate AI into their operations, having a governance platform that can represent and manage both human and AI agents becomes a meaningful differentiator.

Pricing transparency

Peerdom is free for up to 10 users. Beyond that, Peerdom+ starts at CHF 5 per user per month. This per-user model means your cost scales linearly and predictably. Holaspirit/Talkspirit uses a tier-based model starting at 79 EUR per month (Rise) and 149 EUR per month (Scale), with Enterprise pricing on request. For smaller organizations, Peerdom’s per-user pricing is typically more accessible. For full details, see the pricing page.

Data sovereignty

All Peerdom data is hosted in Swiss data centers and is fully GDPR-compliant. Switzerland’s data protection standards are among the strongest globally, and for organizations in regulated industries or with strict data residency requirements, Swiss hosting provides an additional layer of assurance beyond standard EU hosting.

Which Platform Fits Your Organization?

There is no universally correct answer. The right choice depends on how your organization works, what tools you already use, and where you are in your governance journey.

Choose Holaspirit (Talkspirit) if:

• Your organization follows holacracy strictly and wants software built specifically for that framework.
• You need built-in meeting facilitation for governance and tactical meetings and do not want to use a separate meeting tool.
• You prefer an all-in-one suite that combines governance, communication, and document management in a single platform.
• You operate in many languages and need support beyond English, German, and French.
• You do not have an existing communication platform and want one bundled with your governance tool.

Choose Peerdom if:

• Your organization uses any governance model, traditional, agile, hybrid, or plans to evolve its model over time.
• Visual organizational mapping is important for navigation, onboarding, and day-to-day clarity.
• You want a modular platform where you enable only the features you need.
• You already use Microsoft Teams, Slack, or other collaboration tools and want your governance platform to integrate with them rather than replace them.
• You need a comprehensive audit trail of organizational changes with detailed diffs.
• AI-readiness and the ability to represent AI agents within your governance structure matters to your roadmap.
• Data sovereignty with Swiss hosting is a requirement or strong preference.
• Per-user pricing is more practical for your budget than tier-based pricing.

“Peerdom is my favourite tool to play in: map your current state to enable conversations about transformation and visualize multiple potential futures!” — Romina Farrell, Organizational Design Change Agent

For a broader view of the organizational management software landscape and what to look for when evaluating tools, our self-management software guide covers the full category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can Peerdom support holacracy if we are currently using Holaspirit?

Yes. Peerdom fully supports holacratic structures: circles, roles with purpose and accountabilities, lead links, rep links, and governance processes. Many organizations have migrated from Holaspirit to Peerdom and retained their holacratic structure. The difference is that Peerdom also supports other governance models, so if your organization evolves beyond strict holacracy, the platform evolves with you.

Does Peerdom have built-in meeting facilitation like Holaspirit?

No. Peerdom does not include built-in meeting management. Instead, it integrates with dedicated meeting and communication tools. The reasoning is that most organizations already have a preferred tool for meetings (Zoom, Teams, Google Meet) and forcing them into yet another meeting interface creates friction rather than reducing it. Governance decisions and outcomes can be recorded in Peerdom’s Journal, keeping the audit trail intact regardless of where the meeting happens.

What happens to our data if we migrate from Holaspirit to Peerdom?

Peerdom supports data import through its API and our customer success team can assist with migration. Roles, circles, and organizational structure can be mapped from Holaspirit’s model to Peerdom’s model. If you are considering a migration, book a demo and we will walk through the process with you.

Is Holaspirit still being actively developed?

Holaspirit is now part of Talkspirit, and development continues under the Talkspirit umbrella. However, the strategic focus has shifted toward the broader Talkspirit collaboration suite rather than dedicated governance features. It is worth evaluating whether the current feature set meets your needs and whether the development roadmap aligns with your governance priorities.

How does pricing compare for a 50-person organization?

At 50 users, Peerdom+ costs approximately CHF 250 per month (50 users at CHF 5 each). Holaspirit/Talkspirit’s Rise plan is 79 EUR per month and Scale is 149 EUR per month, though specific per-user limits and included features vary by tier. The comparison depends on which tier meets your feature requirements and how many users need access. Check both platforms’ current pricing pages for the most accurate figures.

Can Peerdom work alongside Holaspirit during a transition period?

Yes. Some organizations run both platforms in parallel during migration, using Holaspirit for meeting facilitation while building their organizational map in Peerdom. Because Peerdom integrates with external tools rather than trying to replace them, this coexistence is straightforward.

Does Peerdom support sociocracy in addition to holacracy?

Peerdom supports sociocratic structures natively, including consent-based governance, double-linking, and circle-based organization. You can start with a sociocracy template to get up and running quickly. The platform is framework-agnostic by design, so you can implement sociocracy, holacracy, agile, traditional hierarchy, or any hybrid model without workarounds.

Which platform is better for large enterprises?

Both platforms serve enterprises, but they serve them differently. Holaspirit/Talkspirit appeals to large organizations that want governance and communication in one suite. Peerdom serves enterprises like Bayer, BKW, and Lufthansa that need flexible organizational mapping across complex, multi-model structures. Peerdom currently serves over 250 clients across 18 countries, including organizations ranging from startups to enterprises with tens of thousands of employees.

Ready to See Peerdom in Action?

If you are evaluating governance platforms, the most useful next step is to try them.

• Start a free trial: Map your organization and explore the apps ecosystem. Free for up to 10 users.
• Book a demo: Walk through your specific governance needs with our team and see how Peerdom handles your use case.
• Try the sociocracy template: If you practice sociocracy, start with a pre-configured structure and customize from there.

We believe the best comparisons happen when you use the product yourself. No amount of feature tables replaces the experience of mapping your own organization and seeing whether the tool fits how you actually work.